H.E.S.S. CollaborationH.E.S.S. Collaboration
  • The collaboration
    • H.E.S.S. Institutions
    • H.E.S.S. Organisation
    • H.E.S.S. Prize
    • H.E.S.S. opportunities
  • Science
    • H.E.S.S. News
    • H.E.S.S. Publications
    • H.E.S.S. data release
    • External Proposals
      • visibility calculator
  • Sources of the month
  • Contact
October 1, 2019 by H.E.S.S. Collaboration
Source of the Month

GW170817: Revisiting the site of a binary neutron star merger

GW170817: Revisiting the site of a binary neutron star merger
October 1, 2019 by H.E.S.S. Collaboration
Source of the Month

October 2019

On August 17th 2017, the detection of the first electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational-wave (GW) signal was achieved, originating from the binary neutron star (BNS) merger remnant. This result marked the start of multi-messenger astronomy. The event alone established the connection between short gamma-ray bursts and BNS mergers and it confirmed the forging of heavy elements in the so-called kilonova (see Figure 1 for a sketch). The H.E.S.S. telescopes were part of the most extensive world-wide campaign to search for an electromagnetic signal from the direction of the GW. These observations and their results are reported in [1] and are featured in our Source of the Month of November 2017.

fig1

Fig. 1: Sketch of the BNS merger remnant, the kilonova (or macronova) and the jet that was launched in GW170817. Figure adapted from [2].

As material was propelled out of the system following the merger, and subsequently continued to expand and cool, the optical, ultraviolet and infrared emission kept dimming – so far so good….as expected. However, what surprised many astronomers was the fact that nine days after the merger, non-thermal emission, both in the radio and X-ray energy bands, was detected, and was observed to then brighten for almost the next half a year. Figure 2 illustrates this brightening, which was remarkably similar in both radio and X-rays. This may look like a conspiracy but is a clear signature of electrons being accelerated and emitting non-thermal photons when being deflected in magnetic fields – so-called synchrotron emission. H.E.S.S. covered the peak and plateau of this emission in observations conducted between December 2017 and May 2018.

fig2

Fig. 2: H.E.S.S. observation windows compared to VLA radio data (blue and orange) and X-ray data (red). The H.E.S.S. 1-10 TeV energy flux upper limits shown in green are derived for the prompt follow-up with CT1-5 and the long-term follow-up with the CT5 telescopes and the full CT1-5 telescope system.

So why observe with H.E.S.S. at TeV energies, when the relativistic electrons emit synchrotron emission only to keV X-ray energies? The number of electrons are so abundant in the ejecta, that they will up-scatter the synchrotron photons they have just produced to much higher energies. Think of it as a football pitch filled with players, one player kicks the ball, while another one gives the ball another kick making it even faster. This emission mechanism is well established in objects like the Crab Pulsar Wind Nebula. But what is the expected emission level in the H.E.S.S. domain? Well, this depends on the number of electrons as well as the magnetic field strength… and it is notoriously hard to measure magnetic fields in astrophysical sources. The higher the magnetic field strength, the fewer the number of electrons that are required to explain the measured synchrotron emission. On the other hand, if magnetic fields are low, more electrons are required to produce the measured radio and X-rays. The problem is that by measuring the synchrotron emission alone, we cannot disentangle the two contributors. This is where imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes come in and can break the ambiguity. Different models have been developed before and after the discovery of non-thermal emission following BNS mergers, which try to explain and predict the synchrotron as well as self-Compton emission (e.g. [3,4]).

fig2

Fig. 3: Spectra predicted by the SSC modelling of the remnant of GRB 170817A, 110 days after the merger, for the non-relativistic kilonova (blue) and a relativistic jet (red) scenario. More details are given in the main publication.

For quite some time, there has been a debate within the community if the non-thermal emission originated from the kilonova-like outflow, or from the relativistic off-axis jet. It was the detection of superluminal motion in radio wavelengths, which confirmed that indeed the jet that was launched in the BNS merger is at least one of the sites in the source where acceleration takes place [5]. We took a deep look at the region of the GW170817 event for more than 100 days to search for the respective self-Compton emission. However we unfortunately didn’t detect a signal. Nevertheless, these deep observation and non-detection provide strong upper limits, which can in combination with radio and X-ray emission be translated into limits on the minimum magnetic field in the merger remnant. We have derived these limits and translated them into limits on the magnetic field in the two scenarios: 1) for the case that the spherically expanding kilonova is responsible for the emission, and 2) that the emission indeed originates from the jet seen off-axis. The results we found are shown in Figure 2 and illustrate that magnetic fields of at least ~20 micro-Gauss in the jet scenario, or 200 micro-Gauss in the kilonova scenario are required to explain the synchrotron emission and not violate the H.E.S.S. measurement (Figure 3).

H.E.S.S. article: “Probing the magnetic field in the GW170817 outflow using H.E.S.S. observations”, H.E.S.S. Collaboration (in internal review)


References:

[1] H.E.S.S. Collaboration (H. Abdalla et al.), “TeV gamma-ray observations of the binary neutron star merger GW170817 with H.E.S.S.”, Astrophys. J. Lett 850 (2017) 2
[2] M.M. Kasliwal et al., “Illuminating gravitational waves: A concordant picture of photons from a neutron star merger”, Science 358, 1559-1565
[3] H. Takami, K. Kyutoku, and K. Ioka, “High-energy radiation from remnants of neutron star binary mergers”, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 063006
[4] X. Rodrigues, D. Biehl, D. Boncioli, and A. M. Taylor, “Binary neutron star merger remnants as sources of cosmic rays below the ‘Ankle'”, Astropart. Phys. 106 (2019) 10
[5] K. P. Mooley et el., “Superluminal motion of a relativistic jet in the neutron-star merger GW170817”, Nature 561 (2018) 355

Previous articlePSR B1706-44: The second pulsar detected by H.E.S.S. in the 10-100 GeV energy rangeNext article A Gamma-ray view of Radio Galaxies

Sources of the month

Each month a TeV gamma ray source investigated with the H.E.S.S. telescopes is featured. See also the pages on Astrophysics with H.E.S.S.: The Nonthermal Universe with an overview of the physics and the source types.

More sources

The Vela Pulsar – the most Highly Energetic ClockNovember 1, 2023
HESS J1645−455 – A gem on the ring?October 1, 2023
The identity crisis of the blazar PKS 1510-089August 1, 2023

Categories

  • Source of the Month

Tags

Atmosphere black holes Blazar Galactic Center galactic plane galactic source gamma-rays neutrinos pulsar

Contact

You can contact us for scientific queries and general informations using :
hess-ec@lsw.uni-heidelberg.de

Sources of the month

The Vela Pulsar – the most Highly Energetic ClockNovember 1, 2023
HESS J1645−455 – A gem on the ring?October 1, 2023
The identity crisis of the blazar PKS 1510-089August 1, 2023
H.E.S.S. collaboration official website. Proudly Built By H.E.S.S. members.
(c) 2004-2025 by the H.E.S.S. collaboration

Last sources of the month

The Vela Pulsar – the most Highly Energetic ClockNovember 1, 2023
HESS J1645−455 – A gem on the ring?October 1, 2023
The identity crisis of the blazar PKS 1510-089August 1, 2023

Internal

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
H.E.S.S. Collaboration
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}